Big thanks go out to Gary Sachs for stating what so many of us believe… with clarity, logic and passion.
Published: August 6, 2009 by the Rutland Herald
“Yes officer I was speeding, but it was an oversight.” This tactic generally doesn’t work.
“We measured the temperature but forgot to check the radioactivity,” says the largest radioactive emitter in the state.
“We agreed to a memorandum of understanding and then forgot to implement what we understood,” says the same company.
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee forgot to measure the radioactivity coming off the dry cask storage installation. It is now August. The 2008 fence line dose monitoring data is still not available.
Entergy wants permission to operate another 20 years.
Entergy wants permission to expand their fence line boundary.
Entergy wants permission to spin off Vermont Yankee and a few other reactors into Enexus.
What is wrong with this picture?
In 1967 the Vermont state Legislature agreed to host an in-state nuclear reactor for 40 years, not 60. In 2006, Entergy won permission to store waste in dry casks as long as the radiation off the casks was measured. They forgot.
Where is the common courtesy, aka, compliance with the state that Entergy promised Chairman Dworkin of the Public Service Board in 2002 during the sale case?
Entergy does not show that they can keep their word to the chair of the regulatory board, and Entergy does not hold up its end of the agreements it signs with the Department of Public Service. Clearly one should not reward these poor behaviors with extended operation. Please encourage your state representative and senator to vote against continued operation beyond 2012.