NY Times reporter Matthew Wald looks at the temporary storage of nuclear fuel rods in dry cask storage. Why? Because since the disaster at Fukushima, it is public knowledge that storing rods in pools is vulnerable to natural disasters. But this is nothing more than a band-aid for the next few decades.
And then what?
Will our children have better answers? Is it right to leave this to them?
Can you justify creating any more nuclear waste? No. I didn’t think so.
I invite you to watch the video here.
State appeals NRC ruling
GateHouse News Service
PLYMOUTH — Attorney General Martha Coakley and her counterparts in New York and Connecticut are appealing a Nuclear Regulatory Commission decision that could impact the relicensing of Pilgrim Station Nuclear Power Plant.
Massachusetts, New York and Connecticut officials have filed a brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York challenging the NRC’s ruling that there was no “new and significant information” on the risks of severe accidents in the spent fuel pools at nuclear plants, including Pilgrim and Vermont Yankee, caused by terrorist attack, human error, equipment malfunction, or natural disaster.
In 2006, Massachusetts filed a petition claiming that new and significant information on these risks to Pilgrim and Vermont Yankee, both owned by Entergy Nuclear Operations, and should be part of the relicensing process for each nuclear power plant.
“Our appeal is intended to ensure that the NRC give due consideration, including a meaningful opportunity for public comment, on these important environmental and public safety issues,” Attorney General Coakley said in a press release.
Original article: http://www.wickedlocal.com/plymouth/news/x2133272855/State-appeals-NRC-ruling (published May 6, 2009)
Posted in anti-nuclear, decommissioning, economy, energy, Entergy, Entergy Nuclear, Environment, MA, no nukes, nuclear disaster, nuclear power, nuclear power plant, nuclear waste, security, the environment, The Nuclear Nightmare, Vermont, Vermont Yankee, VT
Tagged Connecticut, CT, Entergy, Entergy Nuclear, Environment, MA, Massachusetts, New York, NRC, nuclear power plant, NY, public safety, relicensing, spent fuel rods
Vermont Yankee is old and unsafe
An editorial published on RutlandHerald.com:
Vermont Yankee produces about 30 tons a year of the most toxic and long-lasting waste known to man, which will stay forever on the banks of the Connecticut River in casks that, over its half-life of 250,000 years, will crack every 100 years or so, leaving this unspeakable waste to thousands of generations of our children (if they live). Ray Shadis called it “the gift that keeps on killing.” Every minute of the day and night it releases radioactive material in the air, none of which is safe, and since children are most vulnerable, they, our children, have been and will continue to be, victims of cancers and leukemias as long as the reactor is rattling along like a broken down old car.
On top of all that there is a sneaky connection between nuclear reactors and the military, with “depleted” uranium (which is making the world for the world’s children a radioactive wasteland) and nuclear bombs, which are all part of the atom-smashing process. Helen Caldecott called Vermont Yankee a “cancer and a bomb factory that must be shut down.”
I understand completely why Sally Shaw placed compost (which she called “good waste”) on the table behind which Entergy’s officials and the NRC sat. Anyone who doesn’t understand, and because of that, not only condemns her, but in the Legislature, might vote to poison us and keep us in constant fear for our children and grandchildren for 20 more years, was never on the side of desperate parents and grandparents anyway, and care nothing about our children.
There are times when I am so tired of feeling sad, hopeless, and cynical in the face of corporate power, that I can hardly find the right words. However, criticism of Sally’s despair and fury, which I share, made me find some.
Thank you, Sally.
(Thank YOU, Jane. You are NOT alone!)
Posted in anti-nuclear, bad behavior, cancer, corporate corruption, death, decommissioning, disappointment, editorial, energy, Entergy, Entergy Nuclear, Environment, no nukes, nuclear disaster, nuclear power, nuclear power plant, nuclear waste, the environment, The Nuclear Nightmare, Vermont, Vermont Yankee, VT
Tagged decommissioning, Entergy, Entergy Nuclear, license extension, nuclear power, nuclear power plant, nuclear waste, spent fuel rods, toxic waste, Vermont Yankee
Vermont Yankee needs a “Certificate of Public Good” in order to get the 20-year extention to operate beyond the nuclear power plant’s scheduled closing. In a county of just over 40,000 people, there were approximately 75 who bothered to show up for the latest meeting of Vermont’s public service board to weigh in on whether Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee deserve the required certification.
According to the Brattleboro Reformer’s news story of May 1 (http://www.reformer.com/ci_12270340), the audience appeared evenly split on whether to grant this certificate or not. Reporter Bob Audette notes that those opposed focused on the environmental impact, the potential costs involved, and the negative impact the over-extended plant will have on the Vermont brand.
Those in favor of granting the certificate seemed to focus only on the tens of thousands of dollars that Entergy has “donated” to local non-profits, as if the local towns would suffer harshly without such charity. It seems to me that a rudimentary review of profits reaped by Entergy Nuclear versus their supposedly charitable investment in local towns would render this argument laughable in the face of the financial burden their spent fuel rods will cost to contain and secure once they have divested themselves of the no-longer-viable plant… twenty years beyond when it was scheduled to close… twenty years beyond when it was built to last.
Let us remember that we were promised a national storage facility for spent nuclear fuel rods… the Yucca Mountain fantasy that will never be. Have we considered the financial burden to the state and to the country based on the reality that the facility will never be built? Has any Vermonter looked over to Maine to review the state costs related to the decomissioning of Maine Yankee in light of the lack of federal safe-keeping of their spent fuel rods?
Fuck Entergy’s playgrounds. Who the hell wants a new playground built from the supposed charitable contributions from a corporation who maintains facilities like this?
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee on August 21, 2007
June 18, 2004 - Fire at Vermont Yankee
Are your tire swings worth it? Why don’t you show the children these photos and ask them if they think it’s worth it to accept their money for playgrounds or little league? I trust that the children will know better. In fact, I already know that they do know better.
A “Certificate of Public Good”? You must be JOKING. Where is the public good in this equation? It DOES NOT EXIST.
Wake up, Vermont. These Louisiana folks are not your friends… and no amount of playground building changes the fact that they want to squeeze as much profit out of a dangerously aging nuclear power plant as they are able to, without regard for the potential short- and long-term financial burdens placed on the state and its residents.
Do not sit idle while your playgrounds are glowing. WAKE UP. Please.
Posted in alternative energy, anti-nuclear, bad behavior, corporate corruption, decommissioning, disappointment, economy, energy, Entergy Nuclear, Environment, liars, newspaper, no nukes, nuclear power, nuclear power plant, nuclear waste, the environment, The Nuclear Nightmare, Vermont, Vermont Yankee, VT
Tagged certificate of public good, charitable donations, decommissioning, economic impact, Entergy, Entergy Nuclear, license extension, playground, radioactivity, risk assessment, spent fuel rods, Vermont Yankee, Yucca Mountain